• sponser

PRESENTS

TYRE PARTNER

  • sponser

ASSOCIATE PARTNER

  • sponser
  • sponser
  • sponser
  • sponser
  • sponser
  • sponser
News » Opinion » Opinion | Hamas, Israel, and the World’s Moral Blind Spots: An International Relations Analysis
3-MIN READ

Opinion | Hamas, Israel, and the World’s Moral Blind Spots: An International Relations Analysis

Written By:

Last Updated:

New Delhi, India

Students occupy the street in front of the Sciences Po University building in support of Palestinians in Gaza, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, in Paris. (Image: Reuters)

Students occupy the street in front of the Sciences Po University building in support of Palestinians in Gaza, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, in Paris. (Image: Reuters)

The Rafah conflict exposes a complex reality: Hamas chooses violence, Israel grapples with impossible security choices, and the world struggles to respond even-handedly

The Israel-Hamas conflict has reached new heights, with Rafah, a southern city in Gaza, becoming the focal point of intense military actions and global scrutiny. Following an Israeli bombardment that unfortunately resulted in the deaths of over 40 Palestinian civilians and the injuries of 200 more, the hashtag “All eyes on Rafah” went viral on social media on May 28. The attack, which was meant to target Hamas leaders Khaled Najjar and Yassin Rabia, accidentally caused an intense fire at a camp of refugees. This resulted in strong condemnation and the development of a widely shared AI-generated graphic that showed the extent of the damage.

Israel responded by launching a counter-campaign titled “What your eyes fail to see,” which highlighted the horrific circumstances in which Hamas was holding 125 Israeli hostages. Through this campaign, the Israel Foreign Ministry hopes to change the perception of the situation and highlight the humanitarian catastrophe that these hostages, including women, children, and senior citizens, are facing.

The genesis of the currently ongoing conflict can potentially be traced to Hamas’ unexpected attacks on Israel on October 7, 2023, which claimed over 1,200 lives, most of whom were civilians, and abducted 252 more. At least 134 hostages, including children, were still taken captive by Hamas as hostilities resumed in November, despite a brief ceasefire. The Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) claimed that a barrage of rockets had been launched from Rafah shortly before the airstrike. Israel’s recent military actions, including the airstrike on Rafah, have been a reaction to continued rocket strikes from Hamas.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has staunchly defended the ongoing operations, emphasising the critical need to target Hamas leadership to safeguard national security. However, he expressed regret over civilian casualties, labelled the incident a “tragic mishap,” and committed to a comprehensive investigation to ensure accountability and prevent future occurrences.

In a decisive move, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Israel to halt its operations in Rafah and withdraw from the area immediately. Despite the clear directive, Israel has yet to fully comply. This verdict was made merely one day after three European countries formally recognised Palestinian statehood, and it followed a wave of worldwide condemnation.

In a comprehensive analysis of the Israeli conflict, political scientists and scholars provide robust frameworks that justify Israel’s actions as both defensive and essential for its survival. Samuel Huntington’s “Clash of Civilisations” theory and John Mearsheimer’s “Offensive Realism” explain Israel’s actions as defensive measures rooted in broader cultural and security dynamics. Concurrently, Alan Dershowitz’s “The Case for Israel” and Michael Walzer’s “Just War Theory” offer moral justifications, emphasising Israel’s right to self-defence and the ethical conduct of its military operations. Collectively, these theories underscore the view that Israel’s actions are vital for its territorial defence and national survival.

The viral “All Eyes on Rafah” campaign highlights the influential role of social media in shaping public opinion and international discourse. However, critics have pointed out the selective nature of this activism, questioning the absence of similar outrage over Hamas’ brutal October 7 attacks, which included the killing of soldiers and taking women hostage, actions that egregiously violated human rights. Notably, no comparable campaign emerged in support of Israel when Hamas crossed all bounds of humanity. This discrepancy raises critical questions about the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) stance and actions during those times of severe aggression against Israel.

Amidst ongoing conflict and relentless criticism, Israel’s stance and struggles are often overlooked. Has anyone truly attempted to understand the relentless challenges Israel faces? As the world’s only Jewish state, Israel has fought tirelessly to re-establish itself, transitioning from ghettos to a sovereign nation surrounded by hostile neighbours. Since its establishment, Israel has faced severe condemnation and has been in constant battle with terrorist groups like Hamas, Houthi, and Hezbollah. Despite these adversities, Israel has not only survived but has also actively sought to foster peaceful relations with neighbouring countries. The unique and profound difficulties Israel endure are often misunderstood or ignored by the international community, which continues to condemn Israel’s actions without fully grasping the relentless threats and existential challenges it faces daily.

In defending Israel’s security, it is imperative to recognise the serious humanitarian crisis that is unfolding in Gaza. According to UN estimates, over a million Palestinians have left the area due to the continuous fighting, and up to 1.4 million have taken refuge in Rafah. Foucault’s notion of “fearless speech” (parrhesia) emphasises the moral obligation to uphold the rights of both Israelis and Palestinians. This fair-minded strategy encourages a considerate conclusion, guaranteeing that the rights and security of each party concerned are given first priority in the pursuit of peace.

Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely that of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18’s views.

first published:June 05, 2024, 13:20 IST
last updated:June 05, 2024, 13:20 IST